Kyle Kempton
5/14/2012
Elements of film
Photography
in film through time
The use of Photography in the
production of film has changed greatly through the course of time as both technology
and taste have evolved. As you will see from this paper the use of photography
in film began very simply, using rudimentary techniques and effects. Then changed
as the medium moved from a novelty to a form culture and art using more
sophisticated and creative techniques. Finally ending where it is today as a
product of commerce where the use of photography is greatly varied and highly
complex in an attempt to please the audience.
Before we begin though we must
consider what exactly photography means to film? According to the dictionary
photography is the process or art of producing images of objects on sensitized
surfaces by the chemical action of light or of other forms of radiant energy. Certainly
this is a formal and precise technical definition of what photography is.
However Robert Hughes, the famous art critic, may have summed up the purpose of
photography when he said, “People inscribe their histories, beliefs, attitudes,
desires and dreams in the images they make.” With these varying definitions in
mind let us take a look at the history of photography in cinema and see if we
cannot determine for ourselves what photographs in movies mean.
When films first came about, under
the direction of the lumière brothers (Auguste and Louis), the role of the cinematographer,
the person who is in charge of directing the camera, didn’t exist. For example
the film Arrival of a train at La Ciotat
(1895)(6) took an entire crew of one to shoot, a number which today is absolutely unprecedented
for a professional film. This is a result of the fact that in the early years
of film, the medium was considered a novelty, something fit for a county fair
rather than an a complex artistic expression worthy of a theater. Indeed rather
than being shown in theaters, early movies were only shown in “Nickelodeons,” (1.)
the original indoor spaces dedicated to motion pictures, so called because it
cost a mere nickel to make the machine run. During these original vaudeville stages,
little thought was given to the art of photography occurring in movies.
Primarily a function of acting, cinematographers, were given little to no
recognition at all. It is difficult to say when this first stage ended.
Nickelodeons had dropped out of style by about 1915 and yet Charlie Chaplin made
well liked movies into the 1930’s and his cinematographer, Rollie Totherho, did
little besides set up the camera.
Either way eventually movies moved
from a novelty to a form of culture and art in the American psyche. During this
period the use of technology in film expanded greatly. Cameras became more lightweight,
portable, and sensitive. Allowing for an expanded array of angles and lighting
to be available to cinematographers and directors. For example the
cinematographer William Daniels had a prestigious reputation with MGM (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer)
studios as “Greta Garbo’s cameraman” because of his ability to glamorously
portray main actresses with extra lighting, something novelty cinema rarely
did. However this period was one of artistry not simply aesthetics, William Daniels
also shot the harshly realistic Greed (1924)(2) and Naked
City (1948)(3). Indeed the nineteen forties and early fifties was the age
of film noir, a time when the American taste in movies craved a high contrast
between black and white, with harshly realistic portrayals of urban life and many
of the traditionally juxtapositional methods practiced by Russian filmmakers. Cinematographers
during this time first became an essential part of the film production crew and
formed into the American Society of Cinematographers (A.S.C.) in 1911 earning
full recognition as part of an elite society of artists. This age too would
fade as many companies began to see movies as a route to profit rather than
simply art, when this happened though is difficult to say. Both the first color
film and America’s best-selling film of all time came out in 1939, but the
Academy still gave out black and white cinematography awards until 1966.
This final and most modern phase saw
leaps in technology and a development of niche markets for films. In the 1950’s
as personal home televisions became popular, movie companies began to develop
gimmicks to try and draw in audiences. Some of these gimmicks included
Smell-o-vision in which theater managers would, on cue, waft smells into the
movie theater. Ultimately these gimmicks failed; however they helped the movie
and cinematography industry realize that in order to remain a viable enterprise
they would need to begin making movies targeted at specific audiences rather
than the populace at large. Even today we can see examples of this in movies
like Riding Giants (2004)(4) and Gum for my Boat (2009) which are films
geared solely toward people fascinated by surfing. Technology has also expanded
by leaps and bounds within this last phase. Though many new stocks and lenses
came into viable use for Cinematographers in the film industry, perhaps the
biggest technological leap was the computer. In the late 1960’s and early 1970’s
directors for the first time began to insert computer generated animations into
films. This slowly grew more and more common in the late 20th
century until the 1990’s with the culmination of PIXAR animation studios, a
film company which makes solely computer generated animations of astoundingly
high quality. Cinematography of today is still a very highly respected art form.
That said film has also evolved into a form of commerce which has made the
cinematographer of today more like a business man than his counterpart form the
second phase of movie history. For example Mauro Fiore won the Academy Award
for Best Cinematography at the 82nd Academy Awards because of his
work on the world’s highest grossing movie ever produced, Avatar (2009), despite the fact he worked on less than 30% of the
film.
The use of photography in film then
is something which has always undergone change, be that for the better or
worse. From a simple single person production for a novelty Nickelodeon in the
early days of movies, cinematography became a complex, intricate and valid form
of art. Before evolving one last time into something which is also a business.
That then may say something about what photography means to film, without it a
film would be nothing but sound in a theater, yet with it the whole film
becomes intricate, complex and capable of invoking emotion and meaning within
people.
1.) A nickelodeon -- Toronto, Canada, 1910
2.) Release poster for Greed (1924)
3.) Shot from Naked City (1948) demonstrating the contrast popular for the time
4.) Poster for the surfing niche movie Riding Giants (2004)
5.) Shot from the film Gum for my boat (2009)
6.) Arrival of a train at La Ciotat
1.) A nickelodeon -- Toronto, Canada, 1910
2.) Release poster for Greed (1924)
3.) Shot from Naked City (1948) demonstrating the contrast popular for the time
4.) Poster for the surfing niche movie Riding Giants (2004)
5.) Shot from the film Gum for my boat (2009)
6.) Arrival of a train at La Ciotat
No comments:
Post a Comment